Notice in the article below —
1st paragraph: “savings, if any, would be minimal”
2nd paragraph: “results were ‘marginally negative'”
Then, finally, the real data
3rd paragraph: “net loss of €54 million in the most likely scenario”
4th paragraph: “losses as high as €140 million”
Also, “no upfront costs to consumers to have Smart Meters fitted” but “it was anticipated that the cost would be incorporated in distribution charges set by electricity and gas suppliers”. Consumers will be paying for a program that provides no net benefit and many liabilities when cheap or free energy conservation measures and incentives could be implemented.
Estimated annual savings to customers of only €34.72 for gas and electric, but what will be the taxes to cover the losses and program expenses? Is that after rate increases to cover the Smart Meters? And what will be the financial costs of lawsuits passed on to the public?
This is the latest study. An earlier study was “largely positive.” Reality is setting in. The expenses will only increase, not decrease. What will the next study show?
The Sunday Times
by Seán McCárthaigh
23 October 2014
IRELAND – THE future of a €1bn project to install electricity and gas smart meters in all homes and most businesses by 2020 could be in doubt after a recent cost-benefit analysis indicated savings, if any, would be minimal.
The report commissioned by the Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) — which is overseeing the planned rollout of the National Smart Metering Programme to more than 2m households — said the results were “marginally negative”.
It estimated that the project would result in the net loss of €54m in the most likely scenario. However, consultancy firm PwC, which carried out the analysis, said its findings should be interpreted as “broadly neutral” given the overall scale of the project and the significant uncertainty about many of the main cost assumptions.
But the latest results will come as a disappointment to the CER as a similar earlier study was largely positive about the combined benefit of smart meters for electricity and gas over a 20-year period. The updated review suggests the cost of the project could outweigh any benefit in all but the most optimistic scenario. The net losses could even be as high as €140m, according to the report.
The figures will also cause some unease for the government which has faced a barrage of criticism over the cost and implementation of the programme for water meters and which will be anxious to avoid a similar controversy in future.
Although there will be no upfront costs for consumers to have smart meters fitted in their homes, a CER spokesman said it was anticipated that the cost would be incorporated in distribution charges set by electricity and gas suppliers.
The energy regulator claims smart meters will result in cheaper energy bills for electricity and gas, more information on energy consumption and greater customer choice as well as reducing Ireland’s CO2 emissions and creating greater efficiencies for utility companies. The programme is designed to reduce electricity and gas consumption during the peak period of 5pm-7pm by encouraging consumers to avail of lower tariffs at other periods.
The recent cost-benefit analysis estimated the average residential household would achieve savings of €16.20 on their annual electricity bill and €18.52 on their gas bill. The CER stated further savings would be derived from electricity and gas suppliers not having to visit homes to read meters which should also be passed on to consumers.
The national rollout of smart meters had been originally scheduled to begin in 2015 but is unlikely to commence before 2018.
It is estimated it will be 2021 before all homes are fitted with smart meters.
A CER spokesman said the programme would proceed to its third stage which would involve a further cost-benefit analysis scheduled for autumn 2016 before any final decision is made with regard to smart metering.
A spokesman for the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources said it was not in a position to comment on the latest figures for the smart metering project.
A spokesman for ESB Networks also declined to comment.
Source article: http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/ireland/News/article1473011.ece
Used under Fair Use Rules.
Illinois Attorney General: Smart Meters are “an experiment too expensive for consumers”
California government report on SCE Smart Meter program: Rising costs eliminate consumer savings
States ask: Will Smart Meters save money or reduce CO2?
“No rational basis” for Smart Meters, says Massachusetts utility company